Refereeing

Latest News:  Melbourn II vs Fenland I Posted on 03/12/2018
Latest News:  Melbourn I vs Portugal Place CUSRC I Posted on 28/11/2018
Latest News:  Melbourn II vs Newmarket II Posted on 26/11/2018
Latest News:  Melbourn II vs Crown Lodge II Posted on 19/11/2018
Latest News:  Hunts County I vs Melbourn Posted on 19/11/2018

Squash 57 (Racketball) Rules

Let, Stroke or No Let?

Consideration Decision Rule
Did interference occur? NO NO LET 12.7.1
YES
       
Was the interference minimal? YES NO LET 12.7.1
NO
       
Could the obstructed player have got to the ball and made a good return and was that player making every effort to do so? NO NO LET 12.7.2
YES
       
Did the obstructed player move past the point of interference and play on? YES NO LET 12.7.3
NO
       
Did the obstructed player create the interference in moving to the ball? YES NO LET 12.7.4
NO
       
Did the opponent make every effort to avoid interference? NO STROKE to player 12.8.1
YES
       
Did the interference prevent the player's reasonable swing? YES STROKE to player 12.8.2
NO
       
Could the obstructed player have made a winning return? YES STROKE to player 12.8.3
NO
       
Would the obstructed player have struck the opponent with the ball going directly to the front wall or if going to a side wall would it have been a winning return?  YES STROKE to player 12.8.4
NO YES LET 12.9